For security leaders
Report posture you can stand behind.
You are asked two questions that tools rarely answer well: how exposed are we, and can we prove what we did about it? ACSE gives you a score that never hides what the cloud reports, a fix path that doesn’t depend on chasing other teams, and a record that holds up in the boardroom and the audit.
An honest headline number
The governed score always sits beside the raw one, so progress on paper can never hide a failing control.
Findings that close
Each finding arrives with a validated fix in your engineers’ own repositories, so the backlog shrinks instead of moving.
Control without bottlenecks
You set policy and who approves what. Rules and tests prepare the change, so your approvers decide rather than investigate.
Posture
Two scores, one honest picture
Your raw score is what the cloud says right now, never adjusted. Your governed score adds what your team has handled on the record: attestations, accepted exceptions and exclusions, each counted and named.
Executive reports carry both, with the counts behind them, so the number you present is the number an auditor will find.
Example tenant · 120 controls
Governed: what your team has handled
Raw: what the cloud says right now, never adjusted
Both scores are always shown together, so a better governed score can never hide what the cloud reports. Illustrative numbers.
What you set
Policy, on your terms
Policy and simulation
Change a policy and see its effect on real findings before anyone turns it on.
Fix-by targets
Targets by severity and environment, with late cases listed.
Who decides
Seven roles mapped from your identity provider. Only Security Approvers decide a case.
AI, if at all
Off by default. Turning any step on needs a second Tenant Admin.
Prioritization
Spend effort where exposure is real
ACSE links misconfigurations into paths from the internet to your data and ranks them. The impact view shows each path before and after the proposed fix.
Your team works the paths that matter first, and you can show why.
The principle
AI can draft and rank. Rules, tests and people decide.
Every fix is generated by rules, validated offline and approved by a person with step-up MFA. ACSE never writes to your cloud and never merges.
Questions
What people ask us
How does ACSE fit with the tools we already run?
ACSE runs its own misconfiguration checks and is designed to fix findings from your existing tools too. It adds the governed fix and the evidence, rather than another list of alerts.
What does ACSE send to its own cloud?
Shapes and counts, such as how many buckets are public. Resource names, identifiers, configuration and credentials stay in your account.
Can we connect our identity provider?
Yes. Sign-in is through OIDC, with groups mapped to ACSE’s roles. Every decision uses step-up MFA from your identity provider.
Keep reading
Related
Approvals and governance
Every ACSE fix needs a person’s approval with step-up MFA, bound to the exact view they saw. Authors don’t approve their own changes, and two people where policy says.
ReadSolutionsContinuous compliance
ACSE evaluates your cloud against signed framework packs on every scan, fixes what fails through your own code and shows a governed score beside the raw one.
ReadACSEWhy ACSE
ACSE sits beside your cloud security platform and cloud-native tools. They find; ACSE adds the governed fix and the evidence, and can fix what other tools find.
ReadTalk to us
See ACSE on your cloud.
Tell us what you run and what your auditors ask for. We’ll show you the loop end to end: a real finding, a fix as code, an approval with MFA and the sealed record.